Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ãµò ¹Ù´Ï½¬¿Í Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ãµò ¾çÄ¡¾× »ç¿ë½Ã Ä¡¸é Âø»ö¸éÀûÀÇ ºñ±³

A COMPARISON OF STAIN RATIO INDUCED BY CHLORHEXIDINE AND CHLORHEXIDINE VARNISH APPLICATION

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 25±Ç 3È£ p.513 ~ 524
ȲÁ¤È¯, ¹Ú¿µ¼ö, ÀÌÁø¿ë,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ȲÁ¤È¯ (  ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
¹Ú¿µ¼ö (  ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÁø¿ë (  ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ãµò ¾çÄ¡¾× »ç¿ë ÈÄ¿¡ ¹ß»ýµÇ´Â Ä¡¸é Âø»öºñÀ²°ú Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ãµò
¹Ù´Ï½¬ µµÆ÷ ÈÄ¿¡ ¹ß»ýµÇ´Â Ä¡¸é Âø»öºñÀ²À» ºñ±³ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ºÀÎ(20´ë ³²³à) 108¸íÀÇ
»óÇÏ¾Ç 4ÀýÄ¡ ¼ø¼³¸éÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿©, ´ëÁ¶±ºÀº 8¸í, ½ÇÇè 1±º ¹× 2±ºÀº °¢°¢ 50¸íÀ¸·Î ÇÏ
¿´´Ù. ¸ðµç ±º¿¡¼­ ½ÇÇè ½ÃÀÛ Àü¿¡ Ä¡¸é¼¼¸¶ÇÏ¿© ±âÁ¸ÀÇ Âø»öÀ» Á¦°ÅÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè 1±ºÀº Ŭ
·Î¸£Çí½Ãµò ¾çÄ¡¾×À» 1ºÐ¾¿ ÇÏ·ç 2ȸ »ç¿ëÇϵµ·Ï ÇÏ¿´°í, ½ÇÇè 2±ºÀº Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ãµò ¹Ù´Ï½¬
¸¦ µµÆ÷ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 4ÁÖ °æ°úÈÄ¿¡ ¸ðµç ±ºÀÇ Ä¡¸éÀ» ±¸³»ÃÔ¿µÇÏ¿©, »çÁø»ó¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³­ Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ ¿ÜÇü
°ú Âø»öµÈ ºÎÀ§ÀÇ ¿ÜÇüÀ» OHP Çʸ§»ó¿¡¼­ Àü»çÇÏ°í ½ºÄ³´×ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ·Î Âø»öµÈ ºÎÀ§ÀÇ
¸éÀûºñÀ²À» »êÃâÇÑ ÈÄ °¢ ±º°£ÀÇ ºñ±³·Î ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ãµò ¾çÄ¡¾× »ç¿ë¿¡ µû¸¥ Ä¡¸é Âø»öºñÀ²Àº ´ëÁ¶±ºº¸´Ù ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç
(p<0.01), Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ãµò ¹Ù´Ï½¬ µµÆ÷¿¡ µû¸¥ Ä¡¸é Âø»öºñÀ²Àº ´ëÁ¶±º°ú À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø´Â
°ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(p<0.01).
2. Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ãµò ¾çÄ¡¾× »ç¿ë¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Âø»ö ºñÀ²Àº »ó¾Ç ¼³¸é¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í, Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ã
µò ¹Ù´Ï½¬ µµÆ÷¿¡ µû¸¥ Âø»öºñÀ²Àº ÇÏ¾Ç ¼³¸é¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç(p<0.01), Ä¡¸éÀÇ À§
Ä¡°¡ Âø»ö¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°úº¸´Ù ¾àÁ¦°¡ Âø»öºñÀ²¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú°¡ ´õ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
3. ½ÇÇè 1±º°ú ½ÇÇè 2±ºÀÇ ´ë»óÀÚ¿¡¼­, Ä¿ÇǸ¦ ¸¶½ÃÁö ¾Ê°í ´ã¹è¸¦ ÇÇ¿ì´Â »ç¶÷ÀÇ Ä¡¸é Âø
»öºñÀ²Àº Ä¿ÇǸ¦ ¸¶½ÃÁö ¾Ê°í ´ã¹èµµ ÇÇ¿ìÁö ¾Ê´Â »ç¶÷º¸´Ù ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç(p<0.01), Ä¿ÇǸ¦ ¸¶½Ã
°í ´ã¹è¸¦ ÇÇÁö ¾Ê´Â »ç¶÷, Ä¿ÇǸ¦ ¸¶½Ã°í ´ã¹èµµ ÇÇ¿ì´Â »ç¶÷ÀÇ Ä¡¸é Âø»öºñÀ²Àº Ä¿ÇǸ¦
¸¶½ÃÁö ¾Ê°í ´ã¹èµµ ÇÇ¿ìÁö ¾Ê´Â »ç¶÷º¸´Ù ³ôÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p>0.01).
4. ½ÇÇè 1±ºÀÇ 14¸í¿¡¼­ ÇôÀÇ ¹è¸é¿¡¼­ Âø»öÀ» °üÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª ½ÇÇè 2±º¿¡¼­´Â ÇôÀÇ
Âø»öÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. µÎ ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ Ä¡Àº »óųª ±¸°­ Á¡¸·ÀÇ ÁÖ¸ñÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ º¯È­´Â ¾î´À
ÂÊ¿¡¼­µµ °üÂû ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¿¡¼­ Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ãµò ¹Ù´Ï½¬ÀÇ »ç¿ëÀ¸·Î Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ã
µò ¾çÄ¡¾× »ç¿ë¿¡ µû¸¥ °¡Àå ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ ºÎÀÛ¿ëÀÎ Ä¡¸é Âø»öºñÀ²À» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç,Èí¿¬Àº Ä¡
¸é Âø»öºñÀ²À» Áõ°¡½ÃÅ°´Â ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇÔÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ±¸³»»çÁø ÃÔ
¿µ°ú ÄÄÇ»Å͸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ä¡¸éÀÇ Âø»öºñÀ² Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â »õ·Î¿î ¹æ¹ýÀ» ½ÃµµÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to compare the staining ratio on the enamel surface
following the use of chlorhexidine mouthwash and the chlorhexidine varnish application.
Labial and lingual surfaces of maxillary and mandibular incisors of adults were
selected to evaluate the staining ratio. The control group was consisted of 8 individuals,
the experimental group 1 and 2 were consisted of 50 each. Prophylaxis with pumice was
performed to remove the stain already established on the enamel surface of all groups.
The group 1 was asked to use chlorhexidine mouthwash(Hexadent, chlorhexidine
gluconate 1m1/100m1) for a minute twice a day. The chlorhexidine
varnishR(ChlorzoinR, consisted of solution 1 (10%
chlorhexidine acetate) and solution 2(polyurethane sealant) ) was applied on the enamel
surfaces of the group 2. After 4 weeks of experiment, intraoral photograph of tooth
surfaces were taken in order to record the stained area on the enamel of the control and
the experimental groups. Outline of teeth and the stained area in the photographs was
traced on the OHP film. Scanner and computer processor were used to calculate stained
surface ratio.

Å°¿öµå

chlorhexidine; mouthwash; tooth stain; varnish;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI